
ConductVision Zebrafish Package
$1,990 per yearA 5-year license is $3,990 in total.
The ConductVision license for zebrafish tests.

Specialized trapezoidal tank system with integrated mirror for quantifying aggression, boldness, and social behaviors in zebrafish and other fish species through controlled mirror-image stimulation protocols.

Director of Science · ConductScience
Ask Louise about Mirror Biting Pham fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.
Already working with us? Sign in to connect this with My Scientist.
The Mirror Biting Test Apparatus (Pham design) is a specialized behavioral testing system for quantifying social behaviors in fish species, particularly zebrafish. The apparatus consists of a 1.5-liter trapezoidal tank with dimensions of 23 cm base length extending to 28 cm mouth length, 7 cm width, and 15 cm height, with an integrated 15 x 7 cm mirror. This design enables controlled assessment of aggression, boldness, and social interaction behaviors through mirror-image stimulation protocols.
The apparatus employs defined behavioral zones with a contact zone within 0.5 cm of the mirror surface and an approach zone within 3 cm, allowing precise quantification of mirror-directed behaviors. Following minimum 18-hour acclimation periods, researchers can conduct standardized observation sessions of at least 5 minutes duration to assess mirror biting frequency, approach latency, and territorial display behaviors. The trapezoidal design optimizes visual access while maintaining appropriate swimming space for natural behavioral expression.
The Mirror Biting Test exploits the natural territorial and social behaviors of fish species, particularly zebrafish, which respond to mirror reflections as conspecific intruders. When a fish encounters its reflection, it interprets the mirrored image as another individual within its territory, triggering species-typical aggressive and territorial responses including biting, charging, and lateral displays. The apparatus design ensures consistent visual presentation of the mirror stimulus while providing adequate swimming space for natural behavioral expression.
Behavioral quantification relies on defined spatial zones relative to the mirror surface. The contact zone (within 0.5 cm of the mirror) captures direct aggressive interactions including biting attempts, while the approach zone (within 3 cm) measures proximity-seeking and territorial positioning behaviors. Researchers can manipulate experimental conditions by introducing the mirror mid-trial to assess novelty responses or maintaining continuous mirror exposure to study habituation patterns.
The trapezoidal tank geometry optimizes visual access for behavioral recording while minimizing spatial constraints that might confound natural swimming patterns. Water temperature maintenance at ambient levels ensures physiological stability throughout testing sessions, while the standardized observation duration of at least 5 minutes provides sufficient sampling of behavioral repertoires for statistical analysis.
| Measurement | Zebrafish |
|---|---|
| Height | 15 cm |
| Width | 7 cm |
| Base tank length | 23 cm |
| The tank length | 28 cm |
| Feature | This Product | Typical Alternative | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tank Capacity | 1.5 liters | Smaller systems often provide 0.5-1.0 L capacity | Larger volume allows more natural swimming behaviors while maintaining controlled mirror interaction distances. |
| Tank Geometry | Trapezoidal design | Most systems use rectangular or circular configurations | Trapezoidal shape optimizes visual recording angles while providing adequate swimming space. |
| Mirror Integration | Fixed 15 x 7 cm integrated mirror | Many systems use removable or adjustable mirrors | Fixed integration ensures consistent stimulus presentation and eliminates positioning variability between trials. |
| Behavioral Zones | Defined 0.5 cm contact and 3 cm approach zones | Zone definitions vary or may be undefined | Standardized zones enable precise quantification and comparison across studies and laboratories. |
| Acclimation Protocol | Minimum 18-hour acclimation requirement | Acclimation periods often shorter or unspecified | Extended acclimation reduces stress artifacts and establishes reliable baseline behavioral patterns. |
| Observation Duration | Minimum 5-minute sessions | Session lengths vary widely across protocols | Standardized duration ensures adequate behavioral sampling for statistical reliability across different research contexts. |
The Mirror Biting Test Apparatus provides a standardized platform for fish behavioral assessment with defined spatial zones, consistent mirror presentation, and established protocols. The trapezoidal design optimizes both behavioral expression and video recording capabilities for comprehensive social behavior quantification.
Allow complete acclimation before mirror introduction to establish baseline swimming patterns and reduce stress-induced behavioral artifacts.
Why: Proper acclimation ensures behavioral responses reflect mirror stimulation rather than handling or environmental stress.
Clearly mark contact and approach zone boundaries using the mirror surface as reference before beginning behavioral scoring.
Why: Precise zone calibration ensures accurate behavioral quantification and enables comparison across sessions and subjects.
Clean mirror surface between subjects using appropriate aquarium-safe cleaning solutions to maintain consistent visual clarity.
Why: Mirror cleanliness affects stimulus intensity and behavioral response consistency across experimental sessions.
Record sessions from multiple camera angles to capture both lateral displays and direct mirror interactions for comprehensive behavioral analysis.
Why: Multiple viewing angles prevent data loss from behavioral events occurring outside primary camera field of view.
If subjects show no mirror interest, verify water clarity, lighting conditions, and mirror positioning relative to swimming areas.
Why: Environmental factors can mask mirror stimulus or reduce behavioral responsiveness leading to false negative results.
Monitor subjects continuously during testing sessions to detect signs of excessive stress or abnormal behaviors requiring session termination.
Why: Early detection of stress responses protects subject welfare and prevents confounding of behavioral measurements.
Maintain consistent ambient lighting conditions across all testing sessions to ensure standardized mirror visibility and behavioral responses.
Why: Lighting variations can alter mirror stimulus intensity and introduce confounding variables in behavioral comparisons.
ConductScience provides a standard one-year manufacturer warranty covering defects in materials and workmanship, with technical support for setup and protocol optimization.
The Mirror Biting test is used to assess social behavior phenotypes in fishes. Neuropsychiatric and Neuropsychological diseases such as Schizophrenia, personality disorders, and autism, all show some form of social deficiency. The Mirror Biting test employs mirror image simulation to quantify social interactions such as boldness, aggression, and sociability. Mirror tests are believed to provide better control of behavior variability and standardization of behaviors to allow repeated trials using the same subject.
Zebrafish model is a popular choice in mirror tests. Not only do they share significant genetic similarity to humans but are also known to be highly social creatures. Further, their robust social behaviors, such as shoaling, boldness, aggression, and social preference make them ideal for studies investigating social behaviors. Zebrafishes usually exhibit boldness by biting the mirror placed in the tank. They can also be seen to trace their reflection by quickly swimming back and forth. These behavioral responses are helpful in examining and evaluating social interactions and behaviors.
Pham’s mirror biting apparatus is composed of a trapezoidal tank and a mirror that snuggly fits the tank. The Mirror Biting task can be performed either by having the mirror already in the tank or introducing the mirror mid-trial to create a sense of novelty. In either case, the Mirror Biting task serves as an effective tool in biobehavioral research. The apparatus can also be used for the Novel Tank Diving test to evaluate anxiety. Other mirror based test include the Mirror Biting (Cattelan), the Mirror Biting (Balzarini) and Mirror Biting (Elwood).
The Mirror Bite apparatus consists of a 1.5 L trapezoidal tank of height 15 cm and width 7 cm, and a 15 x 7 cm mirror. The base of the tank has a length of 23 cm while the mouth of the tank is 28 cm long. The tank is often virtually divided into an approach zone to assist with data recording and observations.
Prior to the experiments clean the apparatus thoroughly. Fill the tank with clean water. Change the stimulus shoal and the water of the experimental tank once every three trials. Appropriately illuminate tank using overhead lighting. For tracking and recording, video and software such as the Noldus Ethovison XT can be used. Ensure that the water is at ambient temperatures.
Shoaling Test
Pretraining
Place groups of fishes from the same holding tank into a pretreatment beaker for at least 5 to 20 minutes. During this period, drugs to investigated can be mixed in with the water of the pretreatment tank before introducing the fishes.
Shoaling test
Place the group into the novel tank (without the mirror) and allow them about 3 minutes to acclimate to the environment. Observe the social interactions between the fishes for at least 3 minutes.
Mirror Biting Test
The Mirror Biting test can be conducted using two protocol that both provide an effective way of evaluating the social behaviors.
Protocol I: Introducing mirror to the tank
Place the subject in the tank and leave it undisturbed for at least 18 hours. Introduce the mirror into the tank without causing significant disturbances to the environment or the fish. Observe the interactions between the fish and the mirror for at least 5 minutes.
This protocol evokes stronger territorial behavior in the fish based on higher mirror novelty.
Protocol II: Introducing the subject to the mirrored tank
Place the mirror on the inner side of the tank and divide the tank into virtual spaces to denote the contacting area (0.5 cm from the mirror) and approach area (3 cm from the mirror). Place the fish in the tank and immediately begin observation of social behaviors.
This protocol uses stronger novelty of both the mirror and the tank to observe social behaviors. However, this protocol may not be suitable for anxious fishes.
Evaluation of the effect of acute ibogaine on zebrafish
Experimentally naïve zebrafish were used in the evaluation of the effects of acute ibogaine on mirror stimulus social interactions. Subjects were pre-exposed in 1-liter beaker to either drug-treated (10 and 20mg/L of ibogaine) or drug-free vehicle solution for 20 minutes. The subjects were then tested in the novel tank without a mirror to evaluate anxiety and locomotion. The subjects were also evaluated for aggressive behaviors using the same tank but with a mirror fixed inside. Both these tests lasted 6-minutes each. In the novel tank test, at 20 mg/L ibogaine reduced freezing duration and at 10 ml/L increased freezing frequency. Both doses also reduced latency to enter the top half of the tank significantly in comparison to controls. In the mirror test, a significant effect of the drug could be observed on the total distance traveled, average velocity, bottom contacts, total approaches, and total mirror contacts. (Cachat et al., 2013)
Evaluation of difference in mirror image fighting versus fighting a real opponent
Most animals do not have the ability of self-recognition. African cichlid fish, Astatotilapia, were used to investigate the differences in behavioral, hormonal and brain activity when the fishes fight a real opponent versus a mirror image. The dominant males were divided into three groups that either encountered a mirror, an opponent or an empty tank (control group). The fish were introduced into the tank with a barrier dividing the tank. The barrier was removed to reveal one of the 3 conditions. The subjects were scored for total aggression. No difference in total aggression or its associated components could be observed between the real opponent and mirror image opponent. However, a significant difference in the effects on the brain could be observed in the two fighting scenarios. Fishes that fought mirror images showed higher levels of egr-1 expression in the dorsolateral telencephalon while fishes with real opponents had a significantly higher c-fos expression in the hippocampus homolog. Further, a higher egr-1 and c-fos expression in the dorsomedial telencephalon of mirror fighting fish could be observed. (Desjardins and Fernald, 2010)
Investigation of performances of different strains of zebrafish in the mirror test
Three strains of zebrafish; TM1, Nadia and SH strains, were used to investigate strain differences in social behaviors. Following boldness tests, the subjects were visually isolated for at least 18-hours. The mirror biting test was performed by introducing the mirror into the tank. It was observed that the TM1 strain showed higher mirror biting frequency in comparison to the other two strains. (Mortez et al., 2005)
The following parameters can be recorded during the Shoaling test.
The following behaviors and parameters can be observed in the Mirror Biting test.
Strengths
Mirror tests have been shown to be a reliable measure of how fish behave with social companions and their social behaviors have been positively correlated with the shoaling tendency. The mirror in the tank can be removed or added as per need. The two protocols that can be used for the Mirror Biting test allow the introduction of different levels of novelty. Introducing the mirror to the tank already holding the fish evokes stronger territorial behavior. The apparatus is simple to construct and allows modifications to suit the needs of investigations. The narrow tank allows creating different densities of shoals to evaluate shoaling behaviors.
Limitations
Although a correlation exists, the mirror test is still a crude method for understanding sociability as some mirror-directed behavior could be the result of fear avoidance. Further, the mirror test does not emulate the characteristics of a real stimulus conspecific thus requiring caution when interpretations are made. The subject may also not be able to see the mirror image from close proximity clearly. The test also deprives the subject of chemical cues involved in typical social interactions between fish when the subject is tested using the mirror image stimulus. Subject’s and the stimulus conspecific’s social personality type also greatly influences the results. Anxious fishes may not perform as expected when introduced to the tank already housing the mirror.
Cachat J, Kyzar EJ, Collins C, Gaikwad S, Green J, Roth A, El-Ounsi M, Davis A, Pham M, Landsman S, Stewart AM, Kalueff AV (2013). Unique and potent effects of acute ibogaine on zebrafish: the developing utility of novel aquatic models for hallucinogenic drug research. Behav Brain Res. 236(1):258-69. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.041.
Desjardins JK, Fernald RD (2010) What do fish make of mirror images? Biology Letter 6(6): 744–747
Marks C, West TN, Bagatto B and Moore FBG (2005). Developmental environment alters conditional aggression in zebrafish. Copeia 4:901–908
Moretz AA, Martins EP, Robinson BD (2007). Behavioral syndromes and the evolution of correlated behavior in zebrafish. Behav Ecol 3:556–562
Oliveira RF, Silva JF, Simoes JM (2011) Fighting zebrafish: characterization of aggressive behavior and winner-loser effects. Zebrafish 8(2):73–81
Pham M. et al. (2012) Assessing Social Behavior Phenotypes in Adult Zebrafish: Shoaling, Social Preference, and Mirror Biting Tests. In: Kalueff A., Stewart A. (eds) Zebrafish Protocols for Neurobehavioral Research. Neuromethods, vol 66. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
From the Maze Engineers documentation for this apparatus.
What fish species can be tested with this apparatus besides zebrafish?
The apparatus is designed for fish species that exhibit territorial and mirror-directed behaviors, though zebrafish remain the most validated model due to their robust social behavioral repertoires and genetic tractability.
How should behavioral zones be validated for accurate scoring?
The contact zone (0.5 cm) and approach zone (3 cm) should be clearly marked and calibrated using the mirror surface as reference, with video recording systems positioned to capture zone boundaries for reliable behavioral quantification.
What is the recommended acclimation protocol before testing?
Allow minimum 18 hours acclimation in the apparatus to reduce handling stress and establish baseline swimming patterns, with water maintained at ambient temperature levels appropriate for the test species.
How long should observation sessions last for reliable data?
Observation sessions should last at least 5 minutes to capture adequate sampling of behavioral repertoires, though longer sessions may be required depending on species-specific activity patterns and research objectives.
Can the mirror be introduced during trials rather than pre-placement?
Yes, the apparatus supports both continuous mirror exposure and mid-trial introduction protocols, allowing researchers to study novelty responses and habituation patterns depending on experimental design requirements.
What behavioral parameters should be quantified during testing?
Key measures include mirror biting frequency, approach latency, time spent in contact and approach zones, territorial display duration, and overall activity levels for comprehensive behavioral phenotyping.
How does tank geometry affect behavioral expression?
The trapezoidal design provides optimal visual access while minimizing spatial constraints, ensuring adequate swimming space for natural behavioral patterns while maintaining consistent mirror presentation angles.
ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it scores standard zebrafish tests, such as those listed below.
The Zebrafish Package includes a custom assay made on request. To have one made for this test, ask in your quote request.

A 5-year license is $3,990 in total.
The ConductVision license for zebrafish tests.
Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer — no call, no scheduling.
Prefer to talk it through?