
Piglet T Maze
Capital T-shaped behavioral maze for assessing spatial learning, memory, and cognitive function in piglets and young swine.

Louise Corscadden, PhD
Director of Science · ConductScience
Ask Louise about Piglet T Maze fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.
Already working with us? Sign in to connect this with My Scientist.
Key Specifications
Full details →- Model fit
- Piglets, Pigs
- SKU family
- ME-8605
- Sizing
- Pig: Arm length 91 cm · Arm width 30 cm
- Ordering
- Online checkout and quote request available
- Category
- Behavioral Mazes
- Build notes
- Confirm accessories, station layout, and support needs before purchase
The Piglet T-Maze is a specialized behavioral assessment apparatus designed for cognitive evaluation of swine. The maze adopts a capital T configuration with a starting corridor (stem) and two choice arms, constructed to accommodate piglet dimensions with appropriate arm widths and wall heights. This apparatus serves as a primary tool for investigating spatial learning, memory formation, and decision-making processes in porcine subjects.
The system incorporates concealed goal boxes positioned at the terminal ends of each choice arm, visible only upon the animal's commitment to entering that specific arm. Food reward placement within these goal boxes provides the motivational framework for learning protocols. The maze supports various experimental paradigms including spatial discrimination, reversal learning, and visual discrimination tasks, making it suitable for comprehensive cognitive assessment in swine behavioral neuroscience research.
How It Works
The T-maze operates on the principle of spatial choice discrimination, where animals must learn to associate specific spatial locations with reward availability. The animal begins each trial in the starting corridor and must choose between two available pathways leading to goal boxes. Successful navigation requires integration of spatial cues, working memory maintenance, and decision-making processes.
Learning is assessed through multiple trial blocks where reward placement follows predetermined patterns. Initial training typically employs consistent reward placement to establish basic task acquisition, followed by reversal protocols where reward contingencies are altered. The concealed nature of goal boxes ensures that animals cannot use visual cues of food presence for decision-making, requiring reliance on learned spatial associations and memory processes.
Performance metrics include choice accuracy, response latency, and trial-to-criterion measurements. The apparatus supports both reference memory testing (consistent reward locations) and working memory evaluation (variable reward placement within sessions), providing comprehensive assessment of different memory systems.
Features & Benefits
Sizes by model
| Measurement | Pig |
|---|---|
| Arm length | 91 cm |
| Arm width | 30 cm |
| Wall height | 50 cm |
- 4 PVC bowls included
Arm Width
- 2.4 meters
Maze Shape
- Capital T shape
Training Trial Duration
- 60 seconds each
Training Trials
- 10 consecutive trials
Normal Trial Duration
- 3 minutes
Normal Trials
- at least 5 trials
Reversal Trial Duration
- 5 minutes
Reversal Trials
- maximum of 6 trials
Maximum Starvation Time
- 2 hours
Goal Boxes
- concealed, visible only when piglet commits to arm
Visual Discrimination Support
- Yes, dot or random image can be added
Behavioral Construct
- spatial learning
- working memory
- reference memory
- decision-making
- cognitive flexibility
- reversal learning
Automation Level
- manual
Species
- Piglets
- Pigs
Dimensions
- 1.98 meters x 1.2 meters
Research Domain
- Behavioral Pharmacology
- Developmental Biology
- Learning and Memory
- Neurodegeneration
- Neuroscience
- Toxicology
Compatible Tracking Software
- ConductVision
Shipping weight
- 21.0 lb
Shipping box
- L: 43.2 cm
- W: 38.0 cm
- H: 27.9 cm
| Feature | This Product | Typical Alternative | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm Width | 30cm arm width accommodating piglet dimensions | Rodent mazes typically use 10-15cm widths | Prevents stress-inducing spatial restriction that could confound cognitive assessment results. |
| Trial Duration | 3-minute normal trials with 5-minute reversal protocols | Shorter durations common in smaller apparatus | Accommodates natural piglet locomotion speed and decision-making patterns for valid behavioral assessment. |
| Wall Height | 50cm wall height providing secure containment | Variable heights depending on target species | Prevents escape behaviors while allowing natural head positioning for environmental assessment. |
| Goal Box Design | Concealed boxes visible only upon arm entry | Open or partially visible reward areas in basic designs | Eliminates visual reward cues, ensuring choices reflect learned spatial associations rather than immediate sensory information. |
| Construction Materials | Includes four standardized PVC reward bowls | Basic setups may lack standardized reward containers | Ensures consistent reward presentation across sessions and experimental conditions. |
| Maze Configuration | Capital T-shape with 91cm arm lengths | Various configurations including Y-maze or cross designs | Provides clear binary choice paradigm essential for quantitative learning assessment without spatial complexity confounds. |
This apparatus combines species-appropriate dimensions with robust experimental design features, including concealed goal boxes and standardized reward systems. The extended trial durations and substantial arm dimensions accommodate piglet behavioral patterns while maintaining rigorous cognitive assessment capabilities.
Practical Tips
Conduct habituation sessions before formal testing to reduce novelty stress and establish baseline exploration patterns.
Why: Stress responses can mask cognitive abilities and reduce validity of learning assessments.
Inspect goal box concealment mechanisms regularly to ensure consistent visual obstruction from start position.
Why: Visual reward cues can compromise spatial learning assessment by enabling stimulus-response rather than cognitive strategies.
Record ambient temperature and humidity during sessions, as thermal comfort affects piglet activity levels and choice behavior.
Why: Environmental factors influence animal performance and should be controlled or documented for data interpretation.
Standardize food reward quantities based on percentage of daily caloric intake rather than absolute amounts.
Why: Consistent motivational states across animals of different sizes improve data reliability and cross-subject comparisons.
If animals show position bias, alternate start box placement or implement correction trials until random choice patterns emerge.
Why: Position preferences unrelated to learning can confound interpretation of cognitive performance measures.
Monitor animals for signs of distress or overheating during extended trial periods, particularly in warm environments.
Why: Swine are susceptible to heat stress, which can affect both welfare and cognitive performance validity.
Maintain detailed session logs including inter-trial intervals, reward consumption, and behavioral observations.
Why: Comprehensive documentation enables identification of factors affecting performance trends and protocol optimization.
Video record sessions from multiple angles to enable post-hoc behavioral analysis and verification of choice timing measurements.
Why: Visual records provide backup data and enable detailed behavioral pattern analysis beyond simple choice outcomes.
Setup Guide
What’s in the Box
- T-maze main structure components
- Four PVC reward bowls
- Assembly hardware and fasteners
- Goal box components
- Setup and protocol documentation (typical)
- Maintenance guidelines (typical)
Warranty
ConductScience provides standard manufacturer warranty coverage for structural components and included accessories, with technical support available for setup and protocol optimization questions.
Compliance
References
Background reading relevant to this product:
Protocol and background
Introduction
Pigs are known to be highly social and intelligent animals making them an attractive choice for behavioral studies. The growing interest in pigs is mainly due to their large gyrencephalic brains that, in comparison to other models such as rodents, are more like human brains. Further, the opportunity of transgenic manipulations in pigs also make them ideal for research (Lind et al., 2007). However, despite the anatomical and physiological similarities between pigs and humans, the large size of the mature animal and poorly defined breeds can be a concern. Thus, researchers often opt for piglets due to their ease of handling.
The Piglet T-Maze is shaped like a capital T. The stem acts as the start corridor while the two arms serve as the choice arms. Animals are often motivated using food rewards which can be placed in the goal boxes of the choice arms. Other mazes also used in assessing pig behaviors include the Pig Open-Field test and the Pig 8-Arm Radial Maze.
Apparatus & Equipment
The piglet T-maze consists of a start alleyway and two choice arms. The arms of the maze have a width of about 2.4m to accommodate the animal. Overall the apparatus is 1.2m wide and 1.98m long. Each goal arm is equipped with a goal box that is only visible to the piglet once it has committed to a goal arm. Behind each goal arm is a bowl of food replacer which is not visible to the piglets. The device permits the addition of a visual discrimination element at the intersection of the maze.
Training Protocol
Clean the device before, after and in-between usage. Appropriately illuminate the maze by using overhead headlights to prevent any shadow formation. Observation and recording of the movements of the subjects can be done using a tracking system such as the Noldus EthoVision XT.
Habituation and Pre-training
Piglets can be housed together before the study period and allowed to explore the maze to get used to the device. Prior to the functional test, animals are to be starved for a maximum of 2 hours.
T-Maze Training
Bait one of the choice arms with a food reward. Place the subject in the T-Maze start arm and guide it first to the non-baited arm followed by the baited arm. Allow the subject to consume the food reward in the baited arm. Perform 10 consecutive trials of 60 seconds each by releasing the subject in the start arm and allowing it to locate the baited arm. If the subject fails to locate the reward within the allocated time, gently guide it to the baited arm and allow it to consume the reward. Subjects that meet the pass criterion can then be progressed to the next trials.
T-Maze Normal Trials
Subjects that successfully met the criterion for the training trial can then be evaluated in normal trials. For these trials, bait one of the goal arms. Allow the subject 3 minutes to locate the reward. Perform at least 5 such trials. In case the subject fails to find the reward, do not guide it to the baited arm and count this as an error.
T-Maze Reversal Trials
Reversal trials should immediately follow the normal trials. For these trials, bait the arm alternate to the previously baited arm. Allow the subject 5 minutes to locate the reward. Perform a maximum of 6 such trials. In case the subject fails to find the reward, do not guide it to the baited arm and count this as an error.
Visual Discrimination Based Task
A visual discrimination element in the form of a dot or a random image can be added to the maze to guide the piglet to the goal arm. The T-Maze task protocol remains the same as mentioned earlier.
Assessment of behavioral alterations after traumatic brain injury
Sullivan et al. (2013) assessed the behavioral alterations of five Yorkshire piglets post-traumatic brain injuring (TBI) using an array of different assays. The piglets were divided into two groups: injury group and sham group. The injured groups underwent a rapid non-impact head rotation in the sagittal plane. It was observed that the injured group had difficulty in learning the task paradigms. The injured animals spent significantly more time in the old location of the food reward in the reversal trials. Further, though not significant, in comparison to the sham group the injured animals took a longer time to reach the rewards in the reversal trials.
Data Analysis
The following data can be analyzed using the T-maze:
- Training pass rate: Number of passed trials over the total number of training trials.
- Time to reach the reward
- Number of errors
- Latency to choose
- Time spent in the baited arm
- Time spent in the non-baited arm
- Total distance moved
- Distance from the reward
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
The T-Maze is a simple and straightforward task for evaluating cognition. The apparatus is also easy to clean. In comparison to other behavioral assays, the T-Maze is less stressful to the animal since it relies on non-aversive motivation. The T-maze comes with its own stationary bowels that prevent the unnecessary spilling of solid or liquid food reward. Behind each arm, there is a goal replacer that ensures that the olfactory cues remain the same in both the goal arms during the experiment. The T-Maze can be easily adapted for different investigations such as by including visual stimuli or guillotine doors.
Limitations
The T-Maze is a single-point two choice maze. Thus, the probability of the animal choosing either of the goal arms is 50%. The subjects may also use strategies other than spatial learning based on spatial and non-spatial cues. The explorative drive of the animal is also critical to obtain appropriate results. Extensive handling and overtraining of the subjects may place undue stress on them, affecting their performance in the maze. Subjects may also suffer from ‘contrast effects’ if there is significant variability in the amount of reward presented during the trials. This could lead to decreased motivation to perform the task. Other factors such as gender, age, and the subject’s own mental state may also impact the task performance. Presence of external disturbances including olfactory, auditory and visual stimuli may also affect the task.
Summary & Key Points
- The Piglet T-Maze is used to study the spatial and cognitive behavior in neonatal piglets.
- A visual discrimination element to guide the piglets to the goal arm can be added to the T-Maze.
- The goal arms of the T-Maze are designed such that the rewards are only visible to the animals once it has completely committed to the arm.
- The goal arms of the T-Maze are designed such that the rewards are only visible to the animals once it has completely committed to the arm.
- The size of pigs makes them a more convenient animal model in research in comparison to the popular rodent models.
References
Lind, N.M., Moustgaard, A., Jelsing, J., Vajta, G., Cumming, P., & Hansen, A.K. (2007). The use of pigs in neuroscience: Modeling brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 31(5), pp 728–751. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.003
Sullivan, S., Friess, S. H., Ralston, J., Smith, C., Propert, K. J., …, Margulies, S. S. (2013). Improved Behavior, Motor, and Cognition Assessments in Neonatal Piglets. Journal of Neurotrauma, 30(20), pp 1770–1779. http://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.2913
From the Maze Engineers documentation for this apparatus.
What age range of piglets can be effectively tested in this apparatus?
The maze accommodates piglets with 30cm arm width, suitable for animals weighing approximately 15-40kg. Consult growth charts for specific age ranges based on breed and nutritional status.
How should food restriction protocols be managed for motivation?
Maximum restriction periods extend to 2 hours before testing. Monitor animal welfare indicators and adjust restriction based on individual response and institutional guidelines.
Can the apparatus support automated data collection?
The maze requires manual timing and observation for data collection. Consider integrating video recording systems or proximity sensors for automated behavioral analysis.
What cleaning protocols are recommended between subjects?
Thorough cleaning with ethanol-based disinfectants removes olfactory cues that could influence subsequent animal performance. Allow complete drying before next session.
How does this compare to rodent T-maze protocols?
Trial durations are extended compared to rodent protocols (3-5 minutes vs 60 seconds) to accommodate species differences in locomotion speed and decision-making patterns.
What visual discrimination capabilities are supported?
The apparatus supports addition of dot patterns or random images for visual discrimination tasks, expanding beyond pure spatial learning assessment.
How many animals can be tested per day?
Individual trial durations and inter-trial intervals determine daily throughput. Plan for adequate rest periods and thorough cleaning between subjects.
What baseline performance metrics should be expected?
Performance criteria vary based on specific protocols and individual animal characteristics. Establish baseline through pilot studies with your specific population.
Have a question about this product?
Have a question? Just ask.
Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer — no call, no scheduling.
Prefer to talk it through?
Accessories
Enhance your setup with compatible accessories






